[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kjdj4KbDhfnTbm8jZpLC1+WPB3E6M8D8M2NLnphMs5vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 09:13:50 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org,
a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
davidgow@...gle.com, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: remove `#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]`
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 6:10 AM Onur Özkan <work@...rozkan.dev> wrote:
>
> Clippy no longer complains about this lint.
Do you have more context? For instance, do you know since when it no
longer complains, or why was the reason for the change? i.e. why we
had the `allow` in the first place, so that we know we don't need it
anymore?
For instance, please how I reasoned about it in commit 5e7c9b84ad08
("rust: sync: remove unneeded
`#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]`").
(It may happen to be the same reason, or not.)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists