linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: Remove unused net in nf_conntrack_double

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250628103240.211386-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:32:40 +0800
From: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <pablo@...filter.org>, <kadlec@...filter.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<horms@...nel.org>, <fw@...len.de>
CC: <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <coreteam@...filter.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: Remove unused net in nf_conntrack_double_lock()

Since commit a3efd81205b1 ("netfilter: conntrack: move generation
seqcnt out of netns_ct") this param is unused.

Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 201d3c4ec623..d80f68e06177 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@ static void nf_conntrack_double_unlock(unsigned int h1, unsigned int h2)
 }
 
 /* return true if we need to recompute hashes (in case hash table was resized) */
-static bool nf_conntrack_double_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int h1,
-				     unsigned int h2, unsigned int sequence)
+static bool nf_conntrack_double_lock(unsigned int h1, unsigned int h2,
+				     unsigned int sequence)
 {
 	h1 %= CONNTRACK_LOCKS;
 	h2 %= CONNTRACK_LOCKS;
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void __nf_ct_delete_from_lists(struct nf_conn *ct)
 		reply_hash = hash_conntrack(net,
 					   &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple,
 					   nf_ct_zone_id(nf_ct_zone(ct), IP_CT_DIR_REPLY));
-	} while (nf_conntrack_double_lock(net, hash, reply_hash, sequence));
+	} while (nf_conntrack_double_lock(hash, reply_hash, sequence));
 
 	clean_from_lists(ct);
 	nf_conntrack_double_unlock(hash, reply_hash);
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert(struct nf_conn *ct)
 		reply_hash = hash_conntrack(net,
 					   &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple,
 					   nf_ct_zone_id(nf_ct_zone(ct), IP_CT_DIR_REPLY));
-	} while (nf_conntrack_double_lock(net, hash, reply_hash, sequence));
+	} while (nf_conntrack_double_lock(hash, reply_hash, sequence));
 
 	max_chainlen = MIN_CHAINLEN + get_random_u32_below(MAX_CHAINLEN);
 
@@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ __nf_conntrack_confirm(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		reply_hash = hash_conntrack(net,
 					   &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple,
 					   nf_ct_zone_id(nf_ct_zone(ct), IP_CT_DIR_REPLY));
-	} while (nf_conntrack_double_lock(net, hash, reply_hash, sequence));
+	} while (nf_conntrack_double_lock(hash, reply_hash, sequence));
 
 	/* We're not in hash table, and we refuse to set up related
 	 * connections for unconfirmed conns.  But packet copies and
-- 
2.34.1