linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: remove `#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250628161117.7786b3a4@nimda.home>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:11:17 +0300
From: Onur <work@...rozkan.dev>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
 airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, ojeda@...nel.org,
 alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
 bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org, a.hindborg@...nel.org,
 aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, rafael@...nel.org,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
 mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, davidgow@...gle.com, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: remove
 `#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]`

On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 14:51:15 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 2:42 PM Onur <work@...rozkan.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I am sure. Just to clarify, I am not testing 5e7c9b84ad08. I am
> > testing c6af9a1191d042839e56abff69e8b0302d117988 where
> > `#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]` was added on
> > `unsafe impl<T: Driver> Send for Registration<T> {}`.
> >
> > Switching from `allow` to `expect` produced the following result on
> > my end:
> 
> Yes, of course it does -- what I am telling you (and what 5e7c9b84ad08
> says) is that the lint is disabled.
> 
> And since it is disabled, if you change the line to `expect`, then it
> will obviously complain.
> 
> If you actually enabled the lint with e.g.
> 
>     #![warn(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]
> 
> at the top of the file, and then used `expect`, it will build fine.


Aha, I see. I missed that. I guess `allow` was added when the author
had this lint enabled on their checkout, but their work was merged when
lint removal was merged before that.

Do you want me to update the patch description by including
5e7c9b84ad08 ref and send v4?

Sorry for misunderstanding by the way!

Many thanks,
Onur