[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cdbd91e-7047-4911-9d82-ee6436d1f9b0@web.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:34:25 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [v3] can: ucan: Use two USB endpoint API functions rather than
duplicating their implementations
>>> Please use the same email address:
>>
>> You may omit the header specification “From:” (if you would find other presented
>> information acceptable), don't you?
>
> You are sending a patch which has some checkpatch warnings
A special warning was mentioned.
> and you think it is
> our duty to fix your mistakes?
It depends …
There can different views occur according to such communication aspects.
> This is not how it works.
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.16-rc3#n513
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch/2.48.0#Documentation/git-format-patch.txt---from
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists