linux-kernel - Ta vs Ya (the polarities of opensource) (was fair pay philosophy, low-jitter)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PAVP192MB213597C53F7C49240992225BE947A@PAVP192MB2135.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 08:19:19 +0000
From: Ywe Cærlyn <ywec4rlyn@...look.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Ta vs Ya (the polarities of opensource) (was fair pay philosophy,
 low-jitter)

I have refined my philosophy now, to Ta vs Ya.

Ta supports Islam, fair pay, 1:1 reality symbolism and conceptology. (Bitstream OS, CDE, XFS)

Ja typically represents regressions, odd symbolism and conceptology. (Mandrake / comicbook, KDE, Reiser)

I am ofcourse on the Ta side.

My research: https://bitology.eu/ Media: https://www.youtube.com/@Mugoth_Star_Bitstreams

Light,
Ywe Cærlyn
Bit Budi