[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac378dff-3eb1-498c-8b01-b7c5146c96bd@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:57:02 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Dave.Martin@....com" <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"thuth@...hat.com" <thuth@...hat.com>, "ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"Shukla, Manali" <Manali.Shukla@....com>, "Yuan, Perry"
<Perry.Yuan@....com>, "kai.huang@...el.com" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"xiaoyao.li@...el.com" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"kan.liang@...ux.intel.com" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"xin3.li@...el.com" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
"xin@...or.com" <xin@...or.com>,
"chang.seok.bae@...el.com" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
"fenghuay@...dia.com" <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 21/32] fs/resctrl: Pass entire struct rdtgroup rather
than passing individual members
Hi Reinette,
On 6/24/2025 11:18 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 6/13/25 2:05 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Reading the monitoring data requires RMID, CLOSID, and event ID, among
>> other parameters. These are passed individually, resulting in architecture
>
> It is not clear how "event ID" and "other parameters" are relevant to this
> change since (in this context) it is only RMID and CLOSID that can be
> found in rdtgroup.
>
>> specific function calls.
>
> Could you please elaborate what you meant with: "These are passed individually,
> resulting in architecture specific function calls."?
Rephrased the whole changelog.
"fs/resctrl: Pass the full rdtgroup structure instead of individual RMID
and CLOSID
The functions resctrl_arch_reset_rmid() and resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
require several parameters, including RMID and CLOSID. Currently, RMID and
CLOSID are passed individually, even though they are available within the
rdtgroup structure.
Refactor the code to pass a pointer to struct rdtgroup instead of
individual members in preparation for this requirement.
Additionally, when "mbm_event" counter assignment mode is enabled, a
counter ID is required to read the event. The counter ID is obtained
through mbm_cntr_get(), which expects a struct rdtgroup pointer."
Thanks
Babu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists