linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] sched/debug: Stop and start server based on if it was active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250630141118.GA2427040@joelnvbox>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:11:18 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] sched/debug: Stop and start server based on if
 it was active

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:16:53 -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 04:32:17PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > @@ -381,7 +382,8 @@ static ssize_t sched_fair_server_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubu
> >  		return  -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
> > +	if (dl_server_active(&rq->fair_server)) {
> > +		was_active = true;
> >  		update_rq_clock(rq);
> >  		dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> >  	}
> > @@ -392,7 +394,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_fair_server_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubu
> >  		printk_deferred("Fair server disabled in CPU %d, system may crash due to starvation.\n",
> >  				cpu_of(rq));
> >  
> > -	if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued)
> > +	if (was_active)
> 
> This is minor but the style looks a bit odd to me. Would it make more sense
> to put was_active in the scoped_guard block and do something like:
> 
>         is_active = dl_server_active(&rq->fair_server);
>         if (is_active) {
>                 ...
>         }
>         ...
>         if (is_active)
>                 dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);

I agree, I will make this change.

> Other than that,
> 
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

thanks!

 - Joel