[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <760CB617-74EA-45F4-90D4-0209132859C9@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:35:11 -0400
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>, Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>, Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm: convert FPB_IGNORE_* into FPB_HONOR_*
On 27 Jun 2025, at 7:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Honoring these PTE bits is the exception, so let's invert the meaning.
>
> With this change, most callers don't have to pass any flags.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/internal.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> mm/madvise.c | 3 +--
> mm/memory.c | 11 +++++------
> mm/mempolicy.c | 4 +---
> mm/mlock.c | 3 +--
> mm/mremap.c | 3 +--
> mm/rmap.c | 3 +--
> 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
LGTM. I assume the callers no longer pass any flags will be converted
to use folio_pte_batch() (no flags) later. I will keep reading.
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists