[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGLJpaNLPYnPwKYV@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:30:13 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] selftests: net: add netpoll basic
functionality test
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:38:54AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:03:11 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > + raise KsftSkipEx("netpoll_poll_dev() was not called. Skipping test")
>
> As discussed offline SKIPing is not an option for SW tests.
Sure, I will move it to failure.
Unfortunately the expected path didn't hit in vmtest. I am still trying
to reproduce the failure on my side, but no luck. It hits from 10 to 16
times per run.
Do you want me to send it as a failure, or, wait until we get something
better that pass 100% of the time?
Thanks
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists