lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGLyswGYD6Zai_sI@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:25:23 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Ben Copeland <ben.copeland@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	sagi@...mberg.me, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: next-20250627: IOMMU DMA warning during NVMe I/O completion
 after 06cae0e3f61c

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 03:33:43PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> > [   32.857521] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc4/0xe8 (P)
> 
> Can you resolve this to a source location for me. i.e.
> 
> gdb vmlinux
> 
> l *(iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc4)
> 
> Also what IOMMU driver is this device using?  It looks like it
> might not support a 4k IOMMU page size.

I think the PRP handling is broken. At the very least, handling the last
element is wrong if it appears at the end of the list, so I think we
need something like this:

---
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static void nvme_free_prps(struct request *req)
        prp_list = iod->descriptors[desc];
        do {
                dma_unmap_page(dma_dev, dma_addr, dma_len, dir);
-               if (i == NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE >> 3) {
+               if (i == NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE >> 3 && length > NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE) {
                        prp_list = iod->descriptors[++desc];
                        i = 0;
                }
--

But even that, the PRP setup doesn't match the teardown. We're calling
dma_map_page() on each PRP even if consecutive PRP's came from the same
dma mapping segment. So even if it had been coalesced, but if the device
doesn't support SGLs, then it would use the prp unmap path.

Ben, can you check if your device supports sgl?

  # nvme id-ctrl /dev/nvme0 | grep sgl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ