[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250630-antique-therapeutic-swift-dec350@krzk-bin>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 09:27:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: hans.zhang@...tech.com
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
mani@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, mpillai@...ence.com, fugang.duan@...tech.com,
guoyin.chen@...tech.com, peter.chen@...tech.com, cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible
for new EP configuration
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 12:15:49PM +0800, hans.zhang@...tech.com wrote:
> From: Manikandan K Pillai <mpillai@...ence.com>
>
> Document the compatible property for HPA (High Performance Architecture)
> PCIe controller EP configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan K Pillai <mpillai@...ence.com>
Missing SoB.
Why are you sending someone else's patches? This just duplicates the
review and creates confusion.
Did you address ENTIRE previous review when you resent this?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists