[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250630074942.GH1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 09:49:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: quic_jiangenj@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, x86@...nel.org,
Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] kcov: x86: introduce CONFIG_KCOV_UNIQUE
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 04:24:36PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 03:41:53PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > The new config switches coverage instrumentation to using
> > > __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard(u32 *guard)
> > > instead of
> > > __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(void)
> > >
> > > This relies on Clang's -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard flag [1].
> > >
> > > Each callback receives a unique 32-bit guard variable residing in the
> > > __sancov_guards section. Those guards can be used by kcov to deduplicate
> > > the coverage on the fly.
> >
> > This sounds like a *LOT* of data; how big is this for a typical kernel
> > build?
>
> I have a 1.6Gb sized vmlinux, which has a .text section of 176Mb.
> There are 1809419 calls to __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard, and the
> __sancov_guards section has a size of 6Mb, which are only allocated at
> runtime.
OK, that's less than I feared. That's ~3.5% of .text, and should be
quite manageable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists