lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250630075638.GJ1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 09:56:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, quic_jiangenj@...cinc.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
	Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] kcov: apply clang-format to kcov code

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:50:18PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:

> Setting AlignConsecutiveDeclarations: AcrossEmptyLinesAndComments will
> replace the above with the following diff:
> 
>  struct kcov_percpu_data {
> -       void                    *irq_area;
> -       local_lock_t            lock;
> -
> -       unsigned int            saved_mode;
> -       unsigned int            saved_size;
> -       void                    *saved_area;
> -       struct kcov             *saved_kcov;
> -       int                     saved_sequence;
> +       void        *irq_area;
> +       local_lock_t lock;
> +
> +       unsigned int saved_mode;
> +       unsigned int saved_size;
> +       void        *saved_area;
> +       struct kcov *saved_kcov;
> +       int          saved_sequence;
>  };
> 
> (a bit denser, plus it aligns the variable names, not the pointer signs)
> Does this look better?

Better yes, but still not really nice.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ