lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d24b2a88-fda7-4a8a-bb5b-73d8a928ff89@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:21:13 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: sound: add bindings for pm4125 audio
 codec

On 28/06/2025 18:41, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> 
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> +            audio-codec@...0 {
>>> +                compatible = "qcom,pm4125-codec";
>>> +                reg = <0xf000>;
>>> +                vdd-io-supply = <&pm4125_l15>;
>>> +                vdd-cp-supply = <&pm4125_s4>;
>>> +                vdd-pa-vpos-supply = <&pm4125_s4>;
>>> +                vdd-mic-bias-supply = <&pm4125_l22>;
>>> +                qcom,micbias1-microvolt = <1800000>;
>>> +                qcom,micbias2-microvolt = <1800000>;
>>> +                qcom,micbias3-microvolt = <1800000>;
>>> +                qcom,rx-device = <&pm4125_rx>;
>>> +                qcom,tx-device = <&pm4125_tx>;
>>> +                #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
>>> +            };
>>> +        };
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    /* ... */
>>> +
>>> +    soundwire@...0000 {
>>
>> Drop this and next one.
> 
> The audio-codec node supposed to have qcom,{rx,tx}-device properties.
> If I'll drop it then the example doesn't compile well unless I am missing
> something?

What did you drop and what did I ask to drop?

> 
> For example when I removed soundwire tx node completely and dropped
> qcom,tx-device then:

I did not ask to drop qcom,tx-device.

...

> 
>>> +  The audio codec IC found on Qualcomm PM4125/PM2250 PMICs.
>>> +  It has RX and TX Soundwire slave devices. This bindings is for the
>>> +  slave devices.
>>
>> Last sentence is redundant and makes no sense. Codec has only slave
>> devices, so how this can be anything else than for slave devices?
> 
> This came from other similar files that describe bindings for child codec nodes
> of soundwire nodes. For example from qcom,wcd937x-sdw.yaml.
> Should this be rephrased to "This bindings is for the soundwire slave devices." ?

You just pasted the same, so I don't get how you want to rephrase into
the same sentence.

> 
Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ