linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] vfio/type1: batch vfio_find_vpfn() in function vfio_unpin_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250630024531.12377-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:45:31 +0800
From: lizhe.67@...edance.com
To: alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: david@...hat.com,
	jgg@...pe.ca,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lizhe.67@...edance.com,
	peterx@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] vfio/type1: batch vfio_find_vpfn() in function vfio_unpin_pages_remote()

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 15:40:59 -0600, alex.williamson@...hat.com wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:23:42 +0800
> lizhe.67@...edance.com wrote:
> 
> > From: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@...edance.com>
> > 
> > This patch is based on patch 'vfio/type1: optimize
> > vfio_pin_pages_remote() for large folios'[1].
> 
> The above and the below link are only necessary in the cover letter, or
> below the --- marker below, they don't really make sense in the
> committed log.
> 
> Anyway, aside from that and one nit on 2/ (sent separately), the series
> looks ok to me and I hope David and Jason will chime in with A-b/R-b
> give the previous discussions.
> 
> Given the build bot error[1] I'd suggest resending all your work in a
> single series, the previous map optimization and the unmap optimization
> here.  That way the dependency is already included, and it's a good
> nudge for acks.  Thanks,

Thank you for your review. I will send a new patchset that includes
the latest optimizations for both map and unmap.

Thanks,
Zhe