[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DAZVBV7S0IE6.VOSX1VWHY1BN@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:31:57 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Andreas Hindborg"
<a.hindborg@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Masahiro
Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, "Nicolas Schier"
<nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Adam
Bratschi-Kaye" <ark.email@...il.com>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, "Petr
Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, "Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@...sung.com>, "Simona Vetter"
<simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Fiona
Behrens" <me@...enk.dev>, "Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
<linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/6] rust: samples: add a module parameter to the
rust_minimal sample
On Mon Jun 30, 2025 at 2:23 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 6/30/25 2:18 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On 6/30/25 2:12 PM, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> (Sorry for being late on this one, just a minor nit below.)
>>>>
>>>> On 6/12/25 3:40 PM, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>>>> struct RustMinimal {
>>>>> @@ -20,6 +26,10 @@ impl kernel::Module for RustMinimal {
>>>>> fn init(_module: &'static ThisModule) -> Result<Self> {
>>>>> pr_info!("Rust minimal sample (init)\n");
>>>>> pr_info!("Am I built-in? {}\n", !cfg!(MODULE));
>>>>> + pr_info!(
>>>>> + "test_parameter: {}\n",
>>>>> + *module_parameters::test_parameter.get()
>>>>
>>>> Can we please call it something else than get(), maybe obtain(), access() or
>>>> just ref()?
>>>
>>> Probably `ref` is the most precise of the options you propose. I would
>>> go with that one. Or, should it be `as_ref`?
>>
>> Guess that works as well.
>>
>> One question additional question: Can't we just impl Deref for
>> ModuleParamAccess<T>?
>
> Just notice that it would work for now, but not in the future, because this will
> apparently require some lock guard? Then maybe access() describes it best?
What about `value()`?
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists