lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250701133333.3871085-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Date: Tue,  1 Jul 2025 15:33:28 +0200
From: "A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: Respect tAR, tCLR in read setup timing

From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>

Having setup time 0 violates tAR, tCLR of some chips, for instance
TOSHIBA TC58NVG2S3ETAI0 cannot be detected successfully (first ID byte
being read duplicated, i.e. 98 98 dc 90 15 76 14 03 instead of
98 dc 90 15 76 ...).

Atmel Application Notes postulated 1 cycle NRD_SETUP without explanation
[1], but it looks more appropriate to just calculate setup time properly.

Without the fix we've measured -2ns tAR delay (REn asserted before ALE
deassert!); with the fix -- 60ns (subject to module clock).

[1] Link: https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/MPU32/ApplicationNotes/ApplicationNotes/doc6255.pdf
Fixes: f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add ->setup_data_interface() hooks")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c
index dedcca87defc7..844df72f45063 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c
@@ -1377,14 +1377,25 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * Read setup timing depends on the operation done on the NAND:
+	 *
+	 * NRD_SETUP = max(tAR, tCLR)
+	 */
+	timeps = max(conf->timings.sdr.tAR_min, conf->timings.sdr.tCLR_min);
+	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(timeps, mckperiodps);
+	totalcycles += ncycles;
+	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_setup(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT,
+					  ncycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * The read cycle timing is directly matching tRC, but is also
 	 * dependent on the setup and hold timings we calculated earlier,
 	 * which gives:
 	 *
-	 * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD)
-	 *
-	 * NRD_SETUP is always 0.
+	 * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_SETUP + NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD)
 	 */
 	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min, mckperiodps);
 	ncycles = max(totalcycles, ncycles);
-- 
2.50.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ