[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250701133724.10162Bea-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:37:24 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com>, ryabinin.a.a@...il.com,
glider@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, kernel@...0n.name, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, richard@....at, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
nathan@...nel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com, morbo@...gle.com,
justinstitt@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, rppt@...nel.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, guoweikang.kernel@...il.com,
tiwei.btw@...group.com, kevin.brodsky@....com, benjamin.berg@...el.com,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] kasan: unify kasan_arch_is_ready with
kasan_enabled
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Your patch below is simpler than what I proposed, but it keeps the static
> branches so the overhead remains.
>
> I also proposed a change, it goes further by removing the static branch for
> architectures that don't need it, see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/cover/20250626153147.145312-1-snovitoll@gmail.com/#3537388
> . Feedback welcome.
Yes, removing the static branches during compile time is of course
even better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists