linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j3NC2ki1XPXfznxZRBLaReDBJ+nzHFgvqMx5+MgERL-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:56:53 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, rafael@...nel.org, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, justin.he@....com, 
	ardb@...nel.org, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ashish.kalra@....com, 
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, 
	robert.moore@...el.com, lvying6@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com, 
	zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com, sudeep.holla@....com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, yazen.ghannam@....com, mark.rutland@....com, 
	mingo@...hat.com, robin.murphy@....com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, 
	bp@...en8.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, tanxiaofei@...wei.com, mawupeng1@...wei.com, 
	linmiaohe@...wei.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com, james.morse@....com, 
	tongtiangen@...wei.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if
 synchronous memory error not recovered

On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:00 PM Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>  >在 2025/4/28 23:23, Will Deacon 写道:
>  >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:10:09AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
>  >>> 在 2025/4/25 09:00, Hanjun Guo 写道:
>  >>>> Call force_sig(SIGBUS) directly in ghes_do_proc() is not my favourite,
>  >>>> but I can bear that, please add
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Thanks
>  >>>> Hanjun
>  >>>
>  >>> Thanks. Hanjun.
>  >>>
>  >>> @Rafael, @Catalin,
>  >>>
>  >>> Both patch 1 and 2 have reviewed-by tag from the arm64 ACPI
> maintainers, Hanjun,
>  >>> now. Are you happpy to pick and queue this patch set to acpi tree
> or arm tree?
>  >>
>  >> Since this primarily touches drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c, I think it should
>  >> go via the ACPI tree and not the arm64 one.
>  >>
>  >> Will
>  >
>  >Hi, Will,
>  >
>  >Thank you for your confirmation :)
>  >
>  >@Rafael, do you have more comments on this patch set?
>  >
>  >Thanks you.
>  >
>  >Best Regards,
>  >Shuai
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Gentle ping.
>
> Does ACPI or APEI tree still active? Looking forward to any response.

For APEI changes, you need an ACK from one of the reviewers listed in
the MAINTAINERS entry for APEI.

Thanks!