[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bd1e6ef-cf3d-4ace-85e8-7f98cf92cc1f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:49:14 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
<toke@...hat.com>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] selftests: pp-bench: remove
page_pool_put_page wrapper
On 27/06/2025 22.04, Mina Almasry wrote:
> Minor cleanup: remove the pointless looking _ wrapper around
> page_pool_put_page, and just do the call directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> ---
> .../net/bench/page_pool/bench_page_pool_simple.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/bench/page_pool/bench_page_pool_simple.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/bench/page_pool/bench_page_pool_simple.c
> index 1cd3157fb6a9..cb6468adbda4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/bench/page_pool/bench_page_pool_simple.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/bench/page_pool/bench_page_pool_simple.c
> @@ -16,12 +16,6 @@
> static int verbose = 1;
> #define MY_POOL_SIZE 1024
>
> -static void _page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
> - bool allow_direct)
> -{
> - page_pool_put_page(pool, page, -1, allow_direct);
> -}
> -
> /* Makes tests selectable. Useful for perf-record to analyze a single test.
> * Hint: Bash shells support writing binary number like: $((2#101010)
> *
> @@ -121,7 +115,7 @@ static void pp_fill_ptr_ring(struct page_pool *pp, int elems)
> for (i = 0; i < elems; i++)
> array[i] = page_pool_alloc_pages(pp, gfp_mask);
> for (i = 0; i < elems; i++)
> - _page_pool_put_page(pp, array[i], false);
> + page_pool_put_page(pp, array[i], -1, false);
>
> kfree(array);
> }
> @@ -180,14 +174,14 @@ static int time_bench_page_pool(struct time_bench_record *rec, void *data,
>
> } else if (type == type_ptr_ring) {
> /* Normal return path */
> - _page_pool_put_page(pp, page, false);
> + page_pool_put_page(pp, page, -1, false);
>
> } else if (type == type_page_allocator) {
> /* Test if not pages are recycled, but instead
> * returned back into systems page allocator
> */
> get_page(page); /* cause no-recycling */
> - _page_pool_put_page(pp, page, false);
> + page_pool_put_page(pp, page, -1, false);
> put_page(page);
The get_page() + put_page() trick is a fairly ugly workaround that I
added when Jakub removed page_pool_release_page() in commit 535b9c61bdef
("net: page_pool: hide page_pool_release_page()").
These extra refcnt increments will make the test slower, but if we are
just aware of this, then we can still compare incremental changes.
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
> } else {
> BUILD_BUG();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists