[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8965bd80-2e3b-42ae-b9fa-75ed451fc1e8@9elements.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:15:26 +0200
From: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer@...ements.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Intel Xe SR-IOV support status
Hi Michal,
On 01.07.25 16:52, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> Hi Marcello,
>
> On 30.06.2025 13:47, Marcello Sylvester Bauer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Starting with Tiger Lake, support for GVT-g was discontinued in favor of
>> SR-IOV for graphics virtualization[1]. Currently, the upstream Xe
>> drivers only support SR-IOV on Panther Lake. The table below summarizes
>> the current state based on the .has_sriov flag.
>>
>> | Intel Gen | drm-xe-next[2] | xe-for-CI[2] | intel lts i915[3] |
>> | --------- | -------------- | ------------ | ----------------- |
>> | TGL | no | no | v5.15 |
>> | ADL/RPL | no | yes (debug) | v5.15 |
>> | MTL | no | no | v6.1 |
>> | ARL | no | no | no |
>> | PTL | v6.13.1 | yes | no |
>
> Note that we also have
>
> | ATSM | no | yes (debug) |
>
Ah, right. I should have clarified that the list only includes platforms
with integrated GPUs.
>>
>> Interestingly, the xe/topic/xe-for-CI testing branch only covers SR-IOV
>> testing on the ADL platform and not the MTL or ARL platforms.
>>
>> Is there a reason why SR-IOV has not yet been enabled on the other
>> platforms?
>
> Since platforms before LNL are not officially supported by the Xe
> driver, we have only enabled SR-IOV on those SDV platforms which are
> actively used and tested by our public CI.
>
That's unfortunate but understandable.
I suppose this means there won't be official support for SR-IOV on
platforms using either the i915 or Xe driver.
>
>> Are there any plans or timeline for adding support for them?
>
> AFAIK it’s unlikely. While in case of TGL the enabling is just a
> one-liner patch with new .has_sriov flag, however for robust MTL it
> would require much more SR-IOV specific code to be added, but there is
> no point to add anything until those platforms itself will be fully
> tested in the native mode (non-virtualized).
Thanks for clarifying! I'm particularly interested in the status of MTL
and ARL because they are the most recent generations on the market.
We are already experimenting with SR-IOV on these platforms to see how
stable they are performing.
Marcello
>
> Michal
>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Marcello
>> ---
>> [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000058558/
>> graphics.html
>> [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe
>> [3] https://github.com/intel/linux-intel-lts
>> [4] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/603316/
>
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xE54B6622A5EDBF61.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (10025 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists