[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGNZP5JFXzFcBVla@makrotopia.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 04:42:55 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>, Elad Yifee <eladwf@...il.com>,
Bo-Cun Chen <bc-bocun.chen@...iatek.com>,
Sky Huang <skylake.huang@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: use genpool
allocator for SRAM
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:47:02PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Use a dedicated "mmio-sram" and the genpool allocator instead of
> open-coding SRAM allocation for DMA rings.
> Keep support for legacy device trees but notify the user via a
> warning to update.
>
> Co-developed-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> ---
> v3: fix resource leak on error in mtk_probe()
> v2: fix return type of mtk_dma_ring_alloc() in case of error
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 117 +++++++++++++-------
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
I just noticed I forgot to 'git add' the Kconfig change adding 'select
GENERIC_ALLOCATOR' for NET_MEDIATEK_SOC... I will include that in v4 and
also add a patch dropping the open coded static partitioning of the SRAM
in favor of always using the gen_pool allocator even with legacy device
trees.
Meanwhile I would still be thankful to see this patch reviewed as apart
from the Kconfig addition it won't change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists