[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGQzfh-36CnS_Jxg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 22:14:06 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Include range.h in cxl.h
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > > After commit aefeb286b960 ("libnvdimm: Don't use "proxy" headers"),
> > > > range.h may not be implicitly included, resulting in a build error:
> > >
> > > That said, I'm not seeing this issue. What config caught this?
> >
> > Fedora's aarch64 configuration [1] is where I initially noticed this.
> > Fedora's rpm site seems to be under the weather for me but I have it
> > mirrored [2] for my own test setup.
>
> Ah, I suspected it was a non-x86 build.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
>
> Dave, I'll pull this in right now.
Thanks, I haven't seen issues and 0-day haven't given any (bad) report so far.
> > [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/raw/rawhide/f/kernel-aarch64-fedora.config
> > [2]: https://github.com/nathanchance/llvm-kernel-testing/raw/refs/heads/main/configs/fedora/aarch64.config
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists