[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250701201027.1171561-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 13:10:25 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf test: Check test suite description properly
Currently perf test checks the given string with descriptions for both
test suites and cases (subtests). But sometimes it's confusing since
the subtests don't contain the important keyword.
I think it's better to check the suite level and run the whole suite
together if it matches description in the suite.
Before:
$ perf test hwmon
(no output)
After:
$ perf test hwmon
10: Hwmon PMU :
10.1: Basic parsing test : Ok
10.2: Parsing without PMU name : Ok
10.3: Parsing with PMU name : Ok
And keep the existing behavior when it only matches test description only.
$ perf test "Equal cpu map"
39.5: Equal cpu map : Ok
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index 80375ca39a37a256..846c9b3a732c9b3a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ static int __cmd_test(struct test_suite **suites, int argc, const char *argv[],
for (struct test_suite **t = suites; *t; t++, curr_suite++) {
int curr_test_case;
+ bool suite_matched = false;
if (!perf_test__matches(test_description(*t, -1), curr_suite, argc, argv)) {
/*
@@ -556,6 +557,8 @@ static int __cmd_test(struct test_suite **suites, int argc, const char *argv[],
}
if (skip)
continue;
+ } else {
+ suite_matched = true;
}
if (intlist__find(skiplist, curr_suite + 1)) {
@@ -567,10 +570,10 @@ static int __cmd_test(struct test_suite **suites, int argc, const char *argv[],
for (unsigned int run = 0; run < runs_per_test; run++) {
test_suite__for_each_test_case(*t, curr_test_case) {
- if (!perf_test__matches(test_description(*t, curr_test_case),
+ if (!suite_matched &&
+ !perf_test__matches(test_description(*t, curr_test_case),
curr_suite, argc, argv))
continue;
-
err = start_test(*t, curr_suite, curr_test_case,
&child_tests[child_test_num++],
width, pass);
--
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists