[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUzPcoMstxfxTiztVAjNwbhny4=fhRnbSu61-sq1k=rew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:38:58 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf test: Check test suite description properly
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:10 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Currently perf test checks the given string with descriptions for both
> test suites and cases (subtests). But sometimes it's confusing since
> the subtests don't contain the important keyword.
>
> I think it's better to check the suite level and run the whole suite
> together if it matches description in the suite.
>
> Before:
> $ perf test hwmon
> (no output)
>
> After:
> $ perf test hwmon
> 10: Hwmon PMU :
> 10.1: Basic parsing test : Ok
> 10.2: Parsing without PMU name : Ok
> 10.3: Parsing with PMU name : Ok
>
> And keep the existing behavior when it only matches test description only.
>
> $ perf test "Equal cpu map"
> 39.5: Equal cpu map : Ok
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> index 80375ca39a37a256..846c9b3a732c9b3a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> @@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ static int __cmd_test(struct test_suite **suites, int argc, const char *argv[],
>
> for (struct test_suite **t = suites; *t; t++, curr_suite++) {
> int curr_test_case;
> + bool suite_matched = false;
>
> if (!perf_test__matches(test_description(*t, -1), curr_suite, argc, argv)) {
> /*
> @@ -556,6 +557,8 @@ static int __cmd_test(struct test_suite **suites, int argc, const char *argv[],
> }
> if (skip)
> continue;
> + } else {
> + suite_matched = true;
> }
>
> if (intlist__find(skiplist, curr_suite + 1)) {
> @@ -567,10 +570,10 @@ static int __cmd_test(struct test_suite **suites, int argc, const char *argv[],
>
> for (unsigned int run = 0; run < runs_per_test; run++) {
> test_suite__for_each_test_case(*t, curr_test_case) {
> - if (!perf_test__matches(test_description(*t, curr_test_case),
> + if (!suite_matched &&
> + !perf_test__matches(test_description(*t, curr_test_case),
> curr_suite, argc, argv))
> continue;
> -
> err = start_test(*t, curr_suite, curr_test_case,
> &child_tests[child_test_num++],
> width, pass);
> --
> 2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists