[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vev8r7KZ79=CoUtt0wbx0x3O0ZckesWtQrxs-MBpiBz_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:03:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Abdun Nihaal <abdun.nihaal@...il.com>, andy@...nel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, tzimmermann@...e.de, riyandhiman14@...il.com,
willy@...radead.org, notro@...nnes.org, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: fbtft: cleanup error handling in fbtft_framebuffer_alloc()
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 8:14 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 12:47:22AM +0530, Abdun Nihaal wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 07:16:38PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > This patch does not apply to my tree, can you rebase and resend?
> >
> > I think you have added both the V1 patch and this current V3 patchset to
> > your tree, that's why this patch does not apply.
> >
> > Commit eb2cb7dab60f ("staging: fbtft: fix potential memory leak in fbtft_framebuffer_alloc()")
> > on staging-testing is an older version of this patchset, and so it has to be dropped.
>
> I can't "drop" patches as my tree can not be rebased. Can you send a
> fix-up patch instead, OR a revert?
I think the cleaner solution will be revert and v3 patches together as
v4. Abdun, can you do that?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists