[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b66b4e76-f07d-4067-8c99-55600bbd2556@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 00:32:09 -0700
From: Libo Chen <libo.chen@...cle.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>,
Abhigyan ghosh <zscript.team.zs@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Kernel panic in __migrate_swap_task() on 6.16-rc2 (NULL
pointer dereference)
Hi Chenyu,
On 6/27/25 00:33, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> On 6/27/2025 3:16 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>> Hi Jirka,
>>
>> On 6/27/2025 5:46 AM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
>>> Hi Chen and all,
>>>
>>> we have now verified that the following commit causes a kernel panic
>>> discussed in this thread:
>>>
>>> ad6b26b6a0a79 sched/numa: add statistics of numa balance task
>>>
>>> Reverting this commit fixes the issue.
>>>
>>> I'm happy to help debug this further or test a proposed fix.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks very much for your report, it seems that there is a
>> race condition that when the swap task candidate was chosen,
>> but its mm_struct get released due to task exit, then later
>> when doing the task swaping, the p->mm is NULL which caused
>> the problem:
>>
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> :
>> ...
>> task_numa_migrate
>> task_numa_find_cpu
>> task_numa_compare
>> # a normal task p is chosen
>> env->best_task = p
>>
>> # p exit:
>> exit_signals(p);
>> p->flags |= PF_EXITING
>> exit_mm
>> p->mm = NULL;
>>
>> migrate_swap_stop
>> __migrate_swap_task((arg->src_task, arg->dst_cpu)
>> count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP)# p->mm is NULL
>>
>> Could you please help check if the following debug patch works,
>
> Attached the patch:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 8988d38d46a3..82fc966b390c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3364,7 +3364,12 @@ static void __migrate_swap_task(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
> {
> __schedstat_inc(p->stats.numa_task_swapped);
> count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
> - count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
> + if (unlikely(!p->mm)) {
I am starting to wonder if we should keep this check and add a big fat warning
like "there is a bug here, please report it!" rather than brick the kernel.
A kernel panic, for sure, helps catch bugs like this more than a line of dmesg,
so it's a tradeoff I guess. What do you think?
Thanks,
Libo
> + trace_printk("!! (%d %s) flags=%lx\n", p->pid, p->comm,
> + p->flags);
> + } else {
> + count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
> + }
>
> if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
> struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists