[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB0MKNAAHYVK.3V2BN2WP3C7ZI@google.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 09:52:55 +0000
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>, <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Corey Minyard <corey@...yard.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable] ipmi:msghandler: Fix potential memory corruption
in ipmi_create_user()
On Mon Jun 30, 2025 at 6:10 PM UTC, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 05:09:02PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
>> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
>>
>> commit fa332f5dc6fc662ad7d3200048772c96b861cf6b upstream
>>
>> The "intf" list iterator is an invalid pointer if the correct
>> "intf->intf_num" is not found. Calling atomic_dec(&intf->nr_users) on
>> and invalid pointer will lead to memory corruption.
>>
>> We don't really need to call atomic_dec() if we haven't called
>> atomic_add_return() so update the if (intf->in_shutdown) path as well.
>>
>> Fixes: 8e76741c3d8b ("ipmi: Add a limit on the number of users that may use IPMI")
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
>> Message-ID: <aBjMZ8RYrOt6NOgi@...nley.mountain>
>> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <corey@...yard.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> I have tested this in 6.12 with Google's platform drivers added to
>> reproduce the bug. The bug causes the panic notifier chain to get
>> corrupted leading to a crash. With the fix this goes away.
>>
>> Applies to 6.6 too but I haven't tested it there.
>
> So what kernels are you wanting this to be applied to?
Right, sorry for the ambiguity. I've just applied the patch to 6.6 and
booted QEMU and it worked fine.
I have not reproduced a crash in 6.6 but it's pretty clearly a real bug
(it decrements the target of an uninitialized pointer).
So if you're OK with that then please apply to 6.6 and 6.12. Otherwise
just 6.12 is fine, I will send another PATCH if I ever hit the issue for
real in 6.6.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists