[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250702174519-0b0fb0a9-3e9b-4a1d-918c-f1a57d2c2935@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 17:48:18 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] printk: KUnit: Followup fixes for the new KUnit test
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 11:51:54AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patchset puts together some followup fixes for the new KUnit test
> which were discussed on several locations.
<snip>
> Arnd Bergmann (1):
> printk: kunit: support offstack cpumask
>
> Petr Mladek (2):
> printk: ringbuffer: Explain why the KUnit test ignores failed writes
> printk: kunit: Fix __counted_by() in struct prbtest_rbdata
>
> kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c | 78 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists