[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250702121502.6e9d6102@batman.local.home>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:15:02 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sam James <sam@...too.org>
Cc: fweimer@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andrii@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, beaub@...ux.microsoft.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
indu.bhagat@...cle.com, jemarch@....org, jolsa@...nel.org,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, jremus@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding
infrastructure
On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 12:44:51 +0100
Sam James <sam@...too.org> wrote:
> In one of the commit messages in the perf series, Steven also gave
> `perf record -g -vv true` which was convenient for making sure it's
> correctly discovered deferred unwinding support.
Although I posted the patch, the command "perf record -g -vv true" was
Namhyung's idea. Just wanted to give credit where credit was due.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists