[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250702182844.GE904431@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:28:44 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: lizhe.67@...edance.com
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] vfio/type1: optimize vfio_unpin_pages_remote() for
large folio
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 03:25:18PM +0800, lizhe.67@...edance.com wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index a02bc340c112..7cacfb2cefe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -802,17 +802,29 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> return pinned;
> }
>
> +static inline void put_valid_unreserved_pfns(unsigned long start_pfn,
> + unsigned long npage, int prot)
> +{
> + unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock(pfn_to_page(start_pfn), npage,
> + prot & IOMMU_WRITE);
> +}
I don't think you need this wrapper.
This patch and the prior look OK
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists