[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZo5O1zONAdyLnp+Nm2ackD5K5hMtQsO_q4fqfxF2wTcPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 17:11:42 -0400
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/rsrc: skip atomic refcount for uncloned buffers
Hi Jens,
Any concerns with this one? I thought it was a fairly straightforward
optimization in the ublk zero-copy I/O path.
Thanks,
Caleb
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM Caleb Sander Mateos
<csander@...estorage.com> wrote:
>
> io_buffer_unmap() performs an atomic decrement of the io_mapped_ubuf's
> reference count in case it has been cloned into another io_ring_ctx's
> registered buffer table. This is an expensive operation and unnecessary
> in the common case that the io_mapped_ubuf is only registered once.
> Load the reference count first and check whether it's 1. In that case,
> skip the atomic decrement and immediately free the io_mapped_ubuf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
> ---
> io_uring/rsrc.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> index 94a9db030e0e..9a1f24a43035 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> @@ -133,12 +133,14 @@ static void io_free_imu(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
> kvfree(imu);
> }
>
> static void io_buffer_unmap(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
> {
> - if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&imu->refs))
> - return;
> + if (unlikely(refcount_read(&imu->refs) > 1)) {
> + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&imu->refs))
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (imu->acct_pages)
> io_unaccount_mem(ctx, imu->acct_pages);
> imu->release(imu->priv);
> io_free_imu(ctx, imu);
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists