[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250702214133.GB2103156@ax162>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 14:41:33 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] tools/build: Fix s390(x) cross-compilation with
clang
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:00:26PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The heuristic to derive a clang target triple from a GCC one does not work
> for s390. GCC uses "s390-linux" while clang expects "s390x-linux" or
> "powerz-linux".
This generally seems fine to me but I do not interact with tools/ much.
> There doesn't seem to be a formal maintainer for this file.
> Maybe the clang/llvm maintainers can pick it up.
I do not have a tree nor do I send pull requests to Linus. Perhaps you
could just pick this up in the nolibc tree or have Shuah take it as a
greater kselftests update?
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists