[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a919ef6-4105-44e0-a17c-e41c1c0abbe9@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 13:06:21 +0530
From: "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@....com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>,
Abhigyan ghosh <zscript.team.zs@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@....com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Kernel panic in __migrate_swap_task() on 6.16-rc2 (NULL
pointer dereference)
On 7/2/2025 10:02 AM, Aithal, Srikanth wrote:
> On 6/27/2025 1:03 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>> On 6/27/2025 3:16 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>>> Hi Jirka,
>>>
>>> On 6/27/2025 5:46 AM, Jirka Hladky wrote:
>>>> Hi Chen and all,
>>>>
>>>> we have now verified that the following commit causes a kernel panic
>>>> discussed in this thread:
>>>>
>>>> ad6b26b6a0a79 sched/numa: add statistics of numa balance task
>>>>
>>>> Reverting this commit fixes the issue.
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to help debug this further or test a proposed fix.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for your report, it seems that there is a
>>> race condition that when the swap task candidate was chosen,
>>> but its mm_struct get released due to task exit, then later
>>> when doing the task swaping, the p->mm is NULL which caused
>>> the problem:
>>>
>>> CPU0 CPU1
>>> :
>>> ...
>>> task_numa_migrate
>>> task_numa_find_cpu
>>> task_numa_compare
>>> # a normal task p is chosen
>>> env->best_task = p
>>>
>>> # p exit:
>>> exit_signals(p);
>>> p->flags |= PF_EXITING
>>> exit_mm
>>> p->mm = NULL;
>>>
>>> migrate_swap_stop
>>> __migrate_swap_task((arg->src_task, arg->dst_cpu)
>>> count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP)# p->mm is NULL
>>>
>>> Could you please help check if the following debug patch works,
>>
>> Attached the patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 8988d38d46a3..82fc966b390c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -3364,7 +3364,12 @@ static void __migrate_swap_task(struct
>> task_struct *p, int cpu)
>> {
>> __schedstat_inc(p->stats.numa_task_swapped);
>> count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>> - count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>> + if (unlikely(!p->mm)) {
>> + trace_printk("!! (%d %s) flags=%lx\n", p->pid, p->comm,
>> + p->flags);
>> + } else {
>> + count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>> + }
>>
>> if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
>> struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq;
>
> I was encountering the same issue as mentioned earlier in this thread,
> which has been recurring in our daily linux-next CI builds within our
> virtualization CI stream where we observed this BUG appearing randomly
> during the runs.
>
> Additionally, we were able to reproduce this issue while running the
> autonuma benchmark. As mentioned earlier, the BUG would occur randomly
> across iterations, typically between the 5th and 10th iterations.
>
> We consistently encountered this issue up to the 6.16.0-rc4-
> next-20250630 build [https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/
> next/linux-next.git].
>
> After applying the aforementioned patch ontop of next-20250630 build, I
> tested it in our virtualization CI and with the autonuma benchmark
> reproducer described below, and the issue no longer occurred. The patch
> appears to have resolved the reported problem.
>
>
> git clone https://github.com/pholasek/autonuma-benchmark.git
> cd autonuma-benchmark
> for i in $(seq 1 80); do bash ./start_bench.sh -s -t; done
> Note: The server running the autonuma-benchmark must have at least two
> nodes.
>
> If the provided fix is final, please feel free to include the following
> Tested-by tag:
>
> Tested-by: Srikanth Aithal <Srikanth.Aithal@....com>
> Tested-by: Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@....com>
>
I apologize for overlooking that this was a debug patch. With this debug
patch applied on top of 6.16.0-rc4-next-20250630, I am unable to
reproduce the issue. However, when I revert this debug patch, I
encounter the issue again on 6.16.0-rc4-next-20250630.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists