[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de7ba157-bede-4ab2-9b8a-cc63c7fafb79@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 17:04:27 +0800
From: Qi Xi <xiqi2@...wei.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>, "Xiongfeng
Wang" <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
CC: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>, <urezki@...il.com>, <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Wangshaobo (bobo)"
<bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] problems report: rcu_read_unlock_special() called in
irq_exit() causes dead loop
Hi Joel,
After applying those 2 patches on the latest kernel, the problem still
occurs. Compared to the previous version which solves this problem, the
difference is the following:
On 2025/7/1 21:29, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
> On 7/1/2025 5:20 AM, Qi Xi wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Friendly ping about this problem :)
>>
> Ah, thanks for checking. The fix is slated for kernel 6.17.
>
> If you want to test it, could you apply it in advance from the RCU tree?
>
> You need these 2:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rcu/linux.git/commit/?h=next&id=6758c93749f8bf09b9282f100c5dd0a5c501f91c
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rcu/linux.git/commit/?h=next&id=3cd298bf3bb69e3bca6abfe97e1b44ffa37f3dee
>
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists