linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Document Qualcomm IPQ SoC's IMEM compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a68f46f0-8053-4d9f-96f7-55de33bb301f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:19:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Document Qualcomm IPQ
 SoC's IMEM compatibles

On 02/07/2025 12:17, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> IMEM is present in the Qualcomm's IPQ SoCs as well. Document the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)


Where is the changelog? This is not a v1.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
> index 72d35e30c439ccf4901d937f838fe7c7a81f33b1..48e2f332e0e9fc9fa4147fa12d9c6c70a77fafda 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ properties:
>      items:
>        - enum:
>            - qcom,apq8064-imem
> +          - qcom,ipq8074-imem
> +          - qcom,ipq6018-imem
> +          - qcom,ipq5018-imem
> +          - qcom,ipq9574-imem
> +          - qcom,ipq5332-imem
> +          - qcom,ipq5424-imem

Random order, no, follow existing style. This applies for every qcom
binding and you received such feedbacks in the past.


Best regards,
Krzysztof