linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v12 04/14] dpll: zl3073x: Add support for devlink device info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <x23jvoo4eycl5whishhsy2qpb5qajsqcx36amltwkqwu5xuj7s@ghg47je4hbjt>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:25:57 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, 
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, 
	Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, 
	Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 04/14] dpll: zl3073x: Add support for
 devlink device info

Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 09:10:39PM +0200, ivecera@...hat.com wrote:

[...]

>+	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%lu.%lu.%lu.%lu",
>+		 FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 24), cfg_ver),
>+		 FIELD_GET(GENMASK(23, 16), cfg_ver),
>+		 FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 8), cfg_ver),
>+		 FIELD_GET(GENMASK(7, 0), cfg_ver));
>+
>+	return devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "cfg.custom_ver", buf);

Nit:

It's redundant to put "ver" string into version name. Also, isn't it
rather "custom_config" or "custom_cfg"?