[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250703123626.GW1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 14:36:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Libo Chen <libo.chen@...cle.com>
Cc: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>,
Srikanth Aithal <Srikanth.Aithal@....com>,
Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix NULL pointer access to mm_struct durng
task swap
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 05:20:47AM -0700, Libo Chen wrote:
> I agree. The other parts, schedstat and vmstat, are still quite helpful.
> Also tracepoints are more expensive than counters once enabled, I think
> that's too much for just counting numbers.
I'm not generally a fan of eBPF, but supposedly it is really good for
stuff like this.
Attaching to a tracepoint and distributing into cgroup buckets seems
like it should be a trivial script.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists