[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGavap5k0qir9x0f@p14s>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 10:27:22 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, afd@...com,
hnagalla@...com, b-padhi@...com
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Fix an error handling path in
k3_dsp_rproc_probe()
Andrew, Hari and Beleswar - please test this on your side and get back to me
with the results.
Thanks,
Mathieu
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:42:33PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> IF an error occurs after a successful k3_rproc_request_mbox() call,
> mbox_free_channel() should be called to avoid a leak.
>
> Such a call is missing in the error handing path of k3_dsp_rproc_probe().
> It is also missing both in the error handling path of k3_m4_rproc_probe()
> and in (in-existent) corresponding remove function.
>
> Switch to managed resources to avoid these leaks and simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Compile tested only.
>
> This is an update of [1].
> The code has been heavily refactored recently with things moved to
> ti_k3_common.c
>
> This new version also fixes a leak in k3_m4_rproc_probe(). In this file,
> mbox_free_channel() was missing.
>
> Being very different from the v3, I've removed the previous review tags.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/591e219df99da6f02c9d402f7854bc3ab23e76f9.1726328417.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 2 --
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
> index d4f20900f33b..7a9c3fb80fec 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,13 @@ int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_rproc_release);
>
> +static void k3_rproc_free_channel(void *data)
> +{
> + struct k3_rproc *kproc = data;
> +
> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> +}
> +
> int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> @@ -173,6 +180,10 @@ int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
> "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, k3_rproc_free_channel, kproc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> /*
> * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
> @@ -183,7 +194,6 @@ int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> index 7a72933bd403..d6ceea6dc920 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -175,8 +175,6 @@ static void k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "failed to detach proc (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> }
> -
> - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> }
>
> static const struct k3_rproc_mem_data c66_mems[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index ca5ff280d2dc..04f23295ffc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -1206,8 +1206,6 @@ static void k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit(void *data)
> return;
> }
> }
> -
> - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists