[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ikk9tdqs.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 18:56:11 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, syzbot
<syzbot+084b6e5bc1016723a9c4@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
x86@...nel.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@...a.com>, David Hildenbrand
<david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Wait for enqueued work regardless of IPI sent
On Wed, Jul 02 2025 at 13:59, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Thomas, please let me know if you already reverted Yury's patch,
> and want me to re-send this without the last hunk.
I did so immediately after saying so in my previous reply. It's gone in
tip and next.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists