[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGa_HFAupmxO_iri@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:34:20 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: alexjlzheng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with
locks
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:52:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:48:47PM +0800, alexjlzheng@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
> >
> > In the buffer write path, iomap_set_range_uptodate() is called every
> > time iomap_end_write() is called. But if folio_test_uptodate() holds, we
> > know that all blocks in this folio are already in the uptodate state, so
> > there is no need to go deep into the critical section of state_lock to
> > execute bitmap_set().
> >
> > Although state_lock may not have significant lock contention due to
> > folio lock, this patch at least reduces the number of instructions.
>
> That means the uptodate bitmap is stale in that case. That would
> only matter if we could clear the folio uptodate bit and still
> expect the page content to survive. Which sounds dubious and I could
> not find anything relevant grepping the tree, but I'm adding the
> linux-mm list just in case.
Once a folio is uptodate, there is no route back to !uptodate without
going through the removal of the folio from the page cache. The read()
path relies on this for example; once it has a refcount on the folio,
and has checked the uptodate bit, it will copy the contents to userspace.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists