[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250704002913.13ce8fcf@foz.lan>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 00:29:13 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa
<akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] docs: kdoc: pretty up dump_enum()
Em Thu, 03 Jul 2025 12:17:42 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > Em Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:57:30 -0600
> > Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> >
> >> self.emit_msg(ln,
> >> - f"expecting prototype for enum {self.entry.identifier}. Prototype was for enum {declaration_name} instead")
> >> + f"expecting prototype for enum {self.entry.identifier}. "
> >> + f"Prototype was for enum {declaration_name} instead")
> >
> > Even being a big one, my personal preference would be to break the long
> > string here, as keeping together is easier for grep, but yeah, I also
> > considered breaking it ;-)
>
> Did you mean your preference would be to *not* break it?
What I meant is that I was in doubt myself of breaking long lines or
not... I opted to not break.
Yet, if you feel it looks better breaking it, go for it ;-)
> There's a non-greppable piece at the break point anyway, so I wasn't
> anticipating making life harder for anybody there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists