[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87plehkjnb.fsf@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 05:01:12 +0100
From: Sam James <sam@...too.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, fweimer@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andrii@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
beaub@...ux.microsoft.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, indu.bhagat@...cle.com,
jemarch@....org, jolsa@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
jremus@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding
infrastructure
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:15:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 12:44:51 +0100
>> Sam James <sam@...too.org> wrote:
>>
>> > In one of the commit messages in the perf series, Steven also gave
>> > `perf record -g -vv true` which was convenient for making sure it's
>> > correctly discovered deferred unwinding support.
>>
>> Although I posted the patch, the command "perf record -g -vv true" was
>> Namhyung's idea. Just wanted to give credit where credit was due.
>
> Yep, it's to check if perf tool ask the deferred callchain to the
> kernel. To check if the kernel returns the callchain properly is:
>
> $ perf report -D | grep -A5 CALLCHAIN_DEFERRED
Thanks both. I'll update my notes and tinker more.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists