[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250703083755.2fee7e7c@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 08:37:55 +0200
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael
J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Shawn
Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...il.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen
Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Derek
Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Len
Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Heikki
Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Geert
Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Davidlohr Bueso
<dave@...olabs.net>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Ira
Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Allan Nielsen
<allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>, Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund
<steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/28] of: property: Allow fw_devlink device-tree on
x86 when PCI device-tree node creation is enabled
Hi Rob, Andy,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:49:36 -0500
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:33 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:22:45AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:47:58PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86))
> > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES))
> > >
> > > I really want CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES to go away at some point, not
> > > add more users.
> > >
> > > I think this should instead check for specific platforms not with
> > > kconfig symbols but DT properties. For ce4100, you can just check the
> > > root compatible string. For OLPC, there isn't a root compatible (in the
> > > DT I have). You could check for /architecture == OLPC instead. There's
> > > some virtualization guests using DT now too. I would think their DT's
> > > are simple enough to avoid any fw_devlink issues.
> >
> > I don't think this is good approach. The above check is more reliable in my
> > opinion.
>
> I'm fine with any solution that doesn't add a
> CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES which we can't remove. Adding it was a
> kick the can down the road to merge the support worry the mixed
> usecase (on ACPI systems) later. It's now later.
>
> > > Alternatively, we could perhaps make x86 fw_devlink default off
> >
> > For my (little) knowledge I believe this is not feasible anymore.
> > Some x86 code (drivers) relies on fw_devlink nowadays. But take
> > this with grain of salt, I may be way mistaken.
>
> Doesn't the CONFIG_X86 check disable it?
>
> Rob
Filtering out by Kconfig seems a no-go:
- Check for CONFIG_OLPC of CONFIG_X86_INTEL_CE as proposed in v1
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250407145546.270683-12-herve.codina@bootlin.com/)
was a no-go from Andy
- Check for CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES as proposed here is a no-go from
Rob
I will follow Rob's suggestion based on DT properties. With a DT property
list, it would be easier to add more x86 fw_delink broken system in the list
of the system to exclude.
Best regards,
Hervé
Powered by blists - more mailing lists