linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the mips tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250703173923.57d49700@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 17:39:23 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer
 <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Linux Kernel
 Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@...look.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the mips tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the pinctrl tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c

between commit:

  98a0bd6aa579 ("pinctrl: xway: mark xway_pinconf_group_set() as static")

from the mips tree and commit:

  e62acaef5d3b ("pinctrl: xway: statify xway_pinconf_group_set()")

from the pinctrl tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the former version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped