[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11840c1e-afff-4004-bc4c-6c88b3df02fa@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 17:03:13 +0800
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, xuewen.yan@...soc.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, hongyan.xia2@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ke.wang@...soc.com, di.shen@...soc.com, xuewen.yan94@...il.com,
kuyo.chang@...iatek.com, juju.sung@...iatek.com, qyousef@...alina.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/uclamp: Skip uclamp_rq_dec() for non-final
dequeue of delayed tasks
Hi Prateek,
在 2025/7/2 11:12, K Prateek Nayak 写道:
> On a closer look at uclamp_rq_dec_id(), I think "uc_se->active"
> will guard against a double accounting. But that is not a good
> reason to sprinkle redundant calls.
Thanks a lot for the clarification!
Best regards,
Zihuan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists