[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <828b473b-c5a5-4c5f-9f7c-200f307cd629@prolan.hu>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 11:12:23 +0200
From: Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "Sascha
Hauer" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: DT: imx6-sr-som: Replace license text comment with
SPDX identifier
Hi,
On 2025. 07. 03. 10:03, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> As Florian has already mentioned, the preferred format for the summary
>>> for arch/arm is "ARM: ... " and by extension for arch/arm/boot/dts,
>>> it's "ARM: dts: ...", not "arm: DT: ..."
>>
>> Ohh, I misread it, I thought it was just about `imx6: board:` ->
>> `imx6-board:`... Ok, I will re-format it for v2.
>
> Note that it applies to _all_ patches to arch/arm/boot/dts.
Naturally. I will do that for all the v2s I will submit from now on. I
hope the current format I've been using today is correct now.
Bence
Powered by blists - more mailing lists