[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1982e894-b61f-48c9-90a0-00e0236aa6be@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 12:17:33 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 4/4] net: phy: smsc: Disable IRQ support to prevent
link state corruption
On 7/1/25 2:58 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 02:21:46PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Disable interrupt handling for the LAN87xx PHY to prevent the network
>> interface from entering a corrupted state after rapid configuration
>> changes.
>>
>> When the link configuration is changed quickly, the PHY can get stuck in
>> a non-functional state. In this state, 'ethtool' reports that a link is
>> present, but 'ip link' shows NO-CARRIER, and the interface is unable to
>> transfer data.
> [...]
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> @@ -746,10 +746,6 @@ static struct phy_driver smsc_phy_driver[] = {
>> .soft_reset = smsc_phy_reset,
>> .config_aneg = lan87xx_config_aneg,
>>
>> - /* IRQ related */
>> - .config_intr = smsc_phy_config_intr,
>> - .handle_interrupt = smsc_phy_handle_interrupt,
>> -
>
> Well, that's not good. I guess this means that the interrupt is
> polled again, so we basically go back to the suboptimal behavior
> prior to 1ce8b37241ed?
>
> Without support for interrupt handling, we can't take advantage
> of the GPIOs on the chip for interrupt generation. Nor can we
> properly support runtime PM if no cable is attached.
>
> What's the actual root cause? Is it the issue described in this
> paragraph of 1ce8b37241ed's commit message?
>
> Normally the PHY interrupt should be masked until the PHY driver has
> cleared it. However masking requires a (sleeping) USB transaction and
> interrupts are received in (non-sleepable) softirq context. I decided
> not to mask the interrupt at all (by using the dummy_irq_chip's noop
> ->irq_mask() callback): The USB interrupt endpoint is polled in 1 msec
> intervals and normally that's sufficient to wake the PHY driver's IRQ
> thread and have it clear the interrupt. If it does take longer, worst
> thing that can happen is the IRQ thread is woken again. No big deal.
>
> There must be better options than going back to polling.
> E.g. inserting delays to avoid the PHY getting wedged.
I agree the solution proposed by this patch looks too rough. I think
more effort should be invested to at least understand why the phy got stuck.
@Oleksij: possibly you could re-submit patch 1-3 only while you keep
investigating the issue addressed here.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists