linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the input tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250704224753.45391b67@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 22:47:53 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski
 <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel
 Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the input
 tree

Hi Bartosz,

On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 11:00:49 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> Ah, I pulled a tag from Lee's MFD tree containing 3bdbd0858df6
> ("Input: adp5589: remove the driver") but I don't have 43a8440f3969
> ("Input: adp5589 - use new GPIO line value setter callbacks") from
> Dmitry's tree. Dmitry: is it too late to get an immutable branch with
> these changes? Or otherwise you can drop 43a8440f3969 from your 6.17
> branch.

It really not a big problem, Linus can be told about this when he
merges the trees ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped