lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu=JdHJdZo0aO+kK-TBNMv3dy-cLyO7KF4RMB20KyDuAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:55:27 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, 
	Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, 
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review

On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 20:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

The following build errors were noticed on arm with gcc-13 and clang-20 on
the stable-rc 6.6.96-rc1.

Test environments:
- arm

Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes

Test regression: 6.6.96-rc1: coresight-core.c error implicit
declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Test log
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c: In function
'coresight_read_claim_tags':
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c:138:16: error: implicit
declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  138 |         return FIELD_GET(CORESIGHT_CLAIM_MASK,
      |                ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

## Build
* kernel: 6.6.96-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: e950145d456d01fa4e589d5e6183c2f8f0676743
* git describe: v6.6.95-140-ge950145d456d
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.95-140-ge950145d456d

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)
* arm, build
  - clang-20-lkftconfig
  - clang-20-u8500_defconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig
  - clang-nightly-u8500_defconfig
  - gcc-13-allmodconfig
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-kasan
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-kunit
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-libgpiod
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-rcutorture
  - gcc-13-u8500_defconfig
  - gcc-8-u8500_defconfig


## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)

## Test result summary
total: 224212, pass: 204338, fail: 5194, skip: 14300, xfail: 380

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 129 total, 113 passed, 15 failed, 1 skipped
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 14 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 36 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped

## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ